Editor’s introduction.

Following consultation with the Council of Editors and with approval from the Publications and Communications Board of the American Psychological Association (APA), it was agreed that in recognition of the appearance of Volume 100 in 1986, Journal of Comparative Psychology (JCP) would publish a set of discussions about our topic. The discussions, contributed in response to the following letters, written last year, appear in this issue. These discussions illustrate the richness and variety of some of the perspectives on the field of comparative psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Does hepatitis G virus cause significant clinical liver disease?

Regarding the newly discovered hepatitis G virus (HGV), little is known about its relation to the cause and clinical significance of acute and chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Lacking a reliable serum immunoassay, the only method available for detecting the viral RNA in patients consists of the rather costly and time consuming RT-PCR. HGV has a worldwide distribution with up to 5% voluntary and 12.9% commercial blood donors infected, yet it appears to be asymptomatic. Moreover, HGV is frequently found as a coinfection with HCV or, to a lesser extent, HBV with symptoms tending to follow the patterns known for HCV or HBV infection, respectively. Being a blood-borne virus, it is most prevalent among members of high risk groups, such as IVDUs, patients on hemodialysis, recipients of blood and blood products and patients infected with HCV, HBV, or HIV, HGV can be parenterally, vertically, or sexually transmitted and after prolonged exposure, the virus may be eliminated by the patient's immune response. As yet, no unambiguous evidence exists regarding HGV's role in causing acute or chronic liver disease and, apart from a few isolated reports to the contrary, the infections appear rather mild. Therefore, more studies are required before a decision can be made whether to routinely screen blood donors for the presence of HGV RNA.     

Evolution of an instinct under long-term divergent selection for geotaxis in domesticated populations of Drosophila melanogaster..

Describes long-term divergent selection for geotaxis in lines of the fruit fly. After 26 yrs (600+ generations) of intermittent selection, the initial experimental procedure showed that the mean geotactic scores remained stable on relaxed selection, a result suggesting that evolutionary changes had occurred in these lines. Because the stability was not due to genetic fixation (homozygosity) of the lines, it is concluded that it was due to either (a) close linkage of genes associated with geotaxis (which would not result in enduring change) or (b) the development of new coadapted gene complexes utilizing genes associated with extreme geotaxis expression (which should result in enduring change). Better evidence for the latter hypothesis was obtained, during the 2nd experimental procedure, from the low- than the high-geotaxis line. The notions of coadaptation and genetic homeostasis are considered, as well as the prospective use of the geotaxis lines to study such concepts experimentally. The geotactic behavior expressed in each line is defined as instinctive: It increases reproductive success and is characteristic of a population. (30 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Selection for central excitation in Drosophila melanogaster..

In 2 populations of fruit fly, bidirectional selection and single-pair matings for high and low expression of central excitatory state (CES) in 4 experiments succeeded in producing from one a high, but not a low, CES line, and from the other a low, but not a high, CES line. Compared with results from the selection studies of the blow fly, Phormia regina, in which 1 major gene correlate of CES has been found, the present results suggest that in D. melanogaster there are several gene correlates of CES, opposite alleles of some of which have become fixed in the divergent lines. (15 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)